Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Project Managers who pretend they are Enterprise Architects
It is fascinating when folks who share their opinion in the blogosphere when they don't know what they're talking about...
In order for a discussion to go anywhere, it requires not just pontification of opinion but some facts as well. Robert McIdiot posted Suggestions for the OWASP maturity model which factually proves that he should more frequently exercise his right to remain silent. Anyway, let's dissect his confusion to see if there is any insight.
If you want to make bets, I bet that you couldn't competently run an open source project because you can only succeed based on command and control. I bet you don't even comprehend the value proposition of open source nor the community model at large. I would bet though that you will either post a stupid response regarding open source or simply practice remaining silent.
Anyway, I hope that the organizations that Robert Mcilree consults for truly get what they pay for...
| | View blog reactionsIn order for a discussion to go anywhere, it requires not just pontification of opinion but some facts as well. Robert McIdiot posted Suggestions for the OWASP maturity model which factually proves that he should more frequently exercise his right to remain silent. Anyway, let's dissect his confusion to see if there is any insight.
- The Enterprise Dilettante is named "project leader" for the "maturity model" project for a relatively new outfit named OWASP - why does the acronym remind me of a venomous insect and not an internationally recognized standards body?
- I wonder what he'll do about contributions to this "effort," particularly code, from India, or eastern Europe.
- yet rail about offshoring even though current IT employment in the US is higher now in 2008 than it was before the dot-bomb implosion earlier in this decade.
- So Jimbo, what's your "maturity model" going to look like? Code? Process (heaven forbid)? Powerpoint (OMG)? How heavy is it? How light? How constrained by the Agile Manifesto? Or not? Bottom line dude: who does it successfully serve?
- It's one thing to get on a soap box and bleat endless platitudes that in the end mean nothing to anyone. On the other hand, if you have something of value to deliver...we're waiting, but not holding our collective breath.
- Show me - and I'm betting that you can't.
If you want to make bets, I bet that you couldn't competently run an open source project because you can only succeed based on command and control. I bet you don't even comprehend the value proposition of open source nor the community model at large. I would bet though that you will either post a stupid response regarding open source or simply practice remaining silent.
Anyway, I hope that the organizations that Robert Mcilree consults for truly get what they pay for...